- Visibility 182 Views
- Downloads 34 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijos.2019.018
- 
                    CrossMark
                    
                        
- Citation
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar disc disease and listhesis – Is it advantageous?
                                                                           
                                        - Author Details:   
- 
                                                                                        Dhurvas Ramlal Ramprasath   
                                            
- 
                                                                                        Vasudevan Thirunarayanan   
                                            
- 
                                                                                        Arjun Rajan *  
                                            
                                    Introduction: Among various spine disorders, degenerative conditions like lumbar disc disease and spondylolisthesis are commonly encountered. Surgery is the option if conservative management fails. Fusion is the only option to alleviate instability. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) is a promising procedure to achieve this goal. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether unilateral TLIF with one cage is comparable with other established techniques.
Materials and Methods: This is a prospective study with 11 males & 11 females who have undergone TLIF for disc disease and low grade listhesis. A single TLIF cage was used for single level pathologies. In one patient with contiguous two level disc disease, two level TLIF was performed.
Results: Results were analysed with respect to intra-op parameters (like surgery duration, blood loss, etc.) and post-op parameters (like fusion, pain relief, etc.). Oswestry Disability Index was used to measure functional outcome. There was a statistically significant improvement in post-op scores (p<0>
Conclusion: Proper patient selection and surgeon’s expertise are important for a successful outcome. TLIF has many advantages when compared to other fusion techniques. It is an ideal management for treating degenerative disc disease and listhesis of low grades. 
Keywords: Transforaminal, Lumbar interbody fusion, Spondylolisthesis, Lumbar disc disease, Degenerative, Radiculopathy.
References
- Frymoyer, J., & Durett, C. The economics of spinal disorders. The Adult Spine. Edited by: Frymoyer J. 1997. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997;1:143-150.
- Andersson G. B. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. The Lancet, 1999;354(9178):581-5.
- Herkowitz H. N., Garfin S. R., Eismont F. J., Bell G. R., & Balderston R. A. Rothman-Simeone the spine: expert consult (Vol. 1). Elsevier Health Sciences. 2011.
- Hanley, E. N., & David, S. M. Current Concepts Review- Lumbar Arthrodesis for the treatment of back pain. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81(5):716-30.
- El Masry, M. A., Khayal, H., & Salah, H. Unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using a single cage for treatment of low grade lytic spondylolisthesis. Acta Orthopædica Belgica 2008;74(5):667.
- Lauber S, Schulte TL, Liljenqvist U, Halm H, Hackenberg L. Clinical and radiologic 2-4-year results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Spine 2006;31:1693-8.
- Harms J, Jeszenszky D. The unilateral transforaminal approach for posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Traumatol 1998;6:88–99.
- Faundez A. A., Schwender J. D., Safriel Y., Gilbert T. J., Mehbod A. A., Denis F., & Wroblewski J. M. Clinical and radiological outcome of anterior–posterior fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for symptomatic disc degeneration: a retrospective comparative study of 133 patients. Eur Spine J 2009;18(2):203-11.
- Deyo RA, Nachemson A, Mirza SK. Spinal-fusion surgery— the case for restraint. N Engl J Med 2004;l350:722–6.
- Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J, Yu LM, Barker K, Collins R. Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial. BMJ 2005;330:1233.
- Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 2001;26:2521–32.
- Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A. Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 2002;27:1131–
- Herkowitz HN, Sidhu KS. Lumbar spine fusion in the treatment of degenerative conditions: current indications and recommendations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1995;3:123–35.
- Ivar Brox J, Sorensen R, Friis A, Nygaard O, Indahl A, Keller A et al. Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine 2003;28:1913-21.
- Rivero-Arias O, Campbell H, Gray A, Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J. Surgical stabilisation of the spine compared with a programme of intensive rehabilitation for the management of patients with chronic low back pain: cost utility analysis based on a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2005;330:1239.
- Lin PM. A technical modification of Cloward’s posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg 1977;1:118-24.
- Hackenberg L., Halm H., Bullmann V., Vieth V., Schneider M., & Liljenqvist, U. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results. Eur Spine J, 2005;14(6):551-8.
- Harms J, Rolinger H: [A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion (author’s transl)]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1982;120:343-7.
- Humphreys S. C., Hodges S. D., Patwardhan A. G., Eck J. C., Murphy R. B., & Covington, L. A. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 2001;26(5):567-71
- Lee L. A., Roth S., Posner K. L., Cheney F. W., Caplan R. A., Newman N. J., & Domino K. B. The American Society of Anesthesiologists Postoperative Visual Loss Registry Analysis of 93 Spine Surgery Cases with Postoperative Visual Loss. J Am Soc Anesthesiol 2006;105(4):652-9.
- Dunker S., Hsu H. Y., Sebag J., & Sadun A. A. Perioperative risk factors for posterior ischemic optic neuropathy. J Am Coll Surg 2002;194(6):705-10.
- Nickels, T. J., Manlapaz, M. R., & Farag, E. Perioperative visual loss after spine surgery. World J Orthop 2014;5(2):100-
- Buono L. M., & Foroozan. Perioperative posterior ischemic optic neuropathy: review of the literature. Surv Ophthalmol 2005;50(1):15-26.
How to Cite This Article
Vancouver
Ramprasath DR, Thirunarayanan V, Rajan A. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar disc disease and listhesis – Is it advantageous? [Internet]. Indian J Orthop Surg. 2019 [cited 2025 Oct 31];5(2):101-105. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijos.2019.018
APA
Ramprasath, D. R., Thirunarayanan, V., Rajan, A. (2019). Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar disc disease and listhesis – Is it advantageous?. Indian J Orthop Surg, 5(2), 101-105. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijos.2019.018
MLA
Ramprasath, Dhurvas Ramlal, Thirunarayanan, Vasudevan, Rajan, Arjun. "Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar disc disease and listhesis – Is it advantageous?." Indian J Orthop Surg, vol. 5, no. 2, 2019, pp. 101-105. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijos.2019.018
Chicago
Ramprasath, D. R., Thirunarayanan, V., Rajan, A.. "Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar disc disease and listhesis – Is it advantageous?." Indian J Orthop Surg 5, no. 2 (2019): 101-105. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijos.2019.018
