• Article highlight
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Metrics




Downlaod Files

   


Article Access statistics

Viewed: 895

PDF Downloaded: 821


Get Permission NVSR Krishna, Ch Prathyush, and Prathap: A short term review of Pipkin fractures type I treated surgically


Introduction

This type of fractures are generally very rare and most probably has a poor functional outcome.1 Keely & Lipscomb stated that this type of fracture with is 0.000002/yr.2 This is one of the emergencies in the orthopaedics and the approach should be very divisive, relocation of the joint must be done as soon as possible under sedation with proper relaxation of muscles to avoid further complications. Immediately after relocation proper, assessment must be done to find any fractures associating to the acetabulum, amount of reduction achieved & any fragments in the joint3 after proper evaluation if all the fragments are in anatomical position it is advised to give conservative treatment in such cases.4 If relocation of the joint is not successful then open reduction and internal fixation should be done as early as possible

Materials and Methods

In the taken span of one year between January 2019 to January 2020, we had TEN type I Pipkin femoral head fractures. Assessment of TEN patients was done and admitted. All Data of the patients were collected and evaluated radiologically. The follow up was done in all the patients for a period of 12 months classification of Pipkin femoral head fractures type I – Which include only non weight bearing area of the femoral head, type II – this type affects the weight bearing part of the fracture, type III -- this may include both type I or II with neck of femur fractures & type IV this includes type I or type II associated with acetabular fracture most commonly effected is fracture of the posterior wall 5 The evaluation was done using the Merle d'Aubigne-Postel score.6 The hip is calculated with this score in three main that’s : pain, mobility, and weight bearing, each scores from 0-6 points where 6 is the maximum. Excellent means all three combined score has 18 points, range between 15--17 points is calssified as good, range between 12-14 points is fair, and that of score <12 points poor shows outcome.

In the cases selected female cases are two, where as male cases were eight. This shows most predominance in males the average age in the individual of the study ranged between 30-59 years, This was not taken into consideration. The main reason for injury is Road Traffic accidents. Reduction of the dislocation of the hip performed short general anesthesia in all the patient as early as possible after admission and all were closed reductions. Ten of the twenty types I Pipkin fracture was treated with open reduction and internal fixation of the fragment with 2 Herbert screws by Smith-Peterson approach (Figure 2), and the rest of the ten were treated conservatively. The total outcome was superb in eight cases treated surgically. One in surgical treated case developed Heterotopic ossifications due to unorthodox massaging done at the village. All the cases were inspected for the range of moments of the hip from the 1 st month of visit permitted partial weight-bearing for surgically treated cases and which was with less pain in surgically treated than the people with conservative treatment. The range of moments in all the surgically treated cases was flexon avg about 85 and only 1 developed limp which is very minimal the abduction is about 20 in all the surgically treated cases and which is a significantly good result than the conservative management.

Figure 1

X-ray showing fracture dislocation with Pipkins fracture

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/4eff33de-b736-4a04-ae72-0150451d0a39/image/dd442c2d-2e99-47e1-a12d-db072e8ad854-uimage.png

Figure 2

Showing the reduced fragment and fixing it with Herbert screw; a): showing the reduced fragment; b): fixing the fragment with screw; c): post fixation fragment stability

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/4eff33de-b736-4a04-ae72-0150451d0a39/image/4278ec8c-7c8f-4ffa-b1b8-533d8579df5b-uimage.png

Figure 3

Showing post op x-ray of the fixation

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/4eff33de-b736-4a04-ae72-0150451d0a39/image/8858e6b8-c42d-44cd-907a-517e7c4cb0da-uimage.png

Figure 4

a,b, &c: Showing the rom of the hip at 12 months visit post-operatively

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/4eff33de-b736-4a04-ae72-0150451d0a39/image/bf977414-8c23-412c-aa92-0224d51960c7-uimage.png

Figure 5

Showing the out come of the study for range of motion

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/4eff33de-b736-4a04-ae72-0150451d0a39/image/a227a108-fe8c-417c-99c4-ef69383727bc-uimage.png

Discussion

Time between dislocation & relocation is the key for the best outcome. Epstein et al. indicated reducing as early as possible gives excellent results than reducing lately.7 Individuals with Pipkin fractures type I can treated conservatively and surgically depending of the choice of the surgeon. If the fragment is large then open reduction and internal fixation provides good to excellent results.8 The reduction must be anatomical to get good result, which is very difficult to achieve in closed manipulation and reduction. Henle et al.4 stated that in his study of closed reduction in this type of fractures he got only 1 in 12 anatomical reduction; if the gap of fracture with displacement of > 2 mm, surgical treatment gave best results than conservative. The ideal treatment of this is controversial. Epstein et al.9 said to treat traumatic dislocations as emergencies and reducing with numerous attempts is contraindicated. His study showed that initial direct surgical intervention showed good results than treating initially as conservative with delayed surgical intervention. McMurtry & Quaile10 failure to reduce the joint with in first 6 hrs showed to boost the probability of developing AVN of the head of the femur and also anatomical reduction in initial 4 hrs showed good functional outcome. The size of the fragment, and position of the fractured fragment also affects the outcome post-operatively. If involving the weight bearing portion the anatomical reduction is the best method to get good outcome.11 Lin et al.12 showed the value of time for the reduction of the larger fragments and also indicated that surgical treatment should be done to get good out comes. Surgical excision of small fragments after closed reduction is some what useful in treating some fracture of type I Pipkin fractures.13 Chakraborti14 & Butler15 even if the treatment is hard and time taking conservative is the best treatment for this type of fracture. In some studies Kocher-Langenbeck, in few the Smith-Peterson approach and in few closed reduction and percutaneous fixation can be done for this type of fracture.1, 7, 9, 16

Conclusion

The fragments should be reduced anatomically that’s the main aim of the surgical intervension with minimal soft tissue injury. No matter the treatment strategy all the patients may develop limp, and in a long-standing study, we can expect the outcome as good in conservative management too which depends mainly on the condition of the patient, severity of the injury, any neurovascular injuries, injury to cartilage, and timing between dislocation and relocation. In our study, it's clear that treating this type I fracture surgically showed better results than the cases treated conservatively in all aspects of early mobilization to the range of moments & further more time has to be taken to find out the long term results.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

Authors had no conflict of interest to disclose.

References

1 

James P. Stannard Howard W. Harris David A. Volgas Jorge E. Alonso Functional Outcome of Patients With Femoral Head Fractures Associated With Hip DislocationsClin Orthop Relat Res 200037744560009-921XOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

2 

P J Kelly P R Lipscomb Primary Vitallium-Mold Arthroplasty for Posterior Dislocation of the Hip with Fracture of the Femoral HeadJ Bone Joint Surg 1958403675800021-9355Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

3 

B R Moed J W Maxey Evaluation of fractures of the femoral head using the CT-directed pelvic oblique radiographClin Orthop Relat Res19932961617

4 

P Henle P Kloen K A Siebenrock Femoral head injuries Which treatment strategy can be recommended?Inj19933847888

5 

G Pipkin Treatment of Grade IV Fracture-Dislocation of the HipJ Bone Joint Surg Am19573951027420021-9355Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

6 

F K Ugino C M Righetti D Pinheiro Lédio Alves R P Guimarães E K Honda Evaluation of the reliability of the modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel MethodActa Ortop Bras2012202137

7 

H C Epstein Traumatic dislocations of the hipClin Orthop Relat Res197311642

8 

K S Park K B Lee B R Na T R Yoon Clinical and radiographic outcomes of femoral head fractures excision vs. fixation of the fragment in Pipkin type I what is the optimal choice for a femoral head fracture?J Orthop Sci2015207027

9 

H C Epstein D A Wiss L Cozen Posterior Fracture Dislocation of the Hip with Fractures of the Femoral HeadClin Orthop Relat Res 19852019170009-921XOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

10 

I A McMurtry A Quaile Closed reduction of the traumatically dislocated hip: a new techniqueInj200132216240020-1383Elsevier BV

11 

S Lederer M Tauber S Karpik R Bogner A Auffarth Fractures of the femoral head. A multicenter studyUnfallchirurg200711051320

12 

D Lin K Lian Z Chen L Wang J Hao Emergent surgical reduction and fixation for Pipkin type I femoral fracturesOrthopedics201336778782

13 

Z W Chen B Lin W L Zhai Z M Guo Z Liang Conservative versus surgical management of Pipkin type I fractures associated with posterior dislocation of the hipa randomized controlled trialInt Orthop201135107781

14 

S. Chakraborti I.M. Miller Dislocation of the hip associated with fracture of the femoral headInj197572134420020-1383Elsevier BV

15 

J E Butler Pipkin Type-II fractures of the femoral head.J Bone Jt Surg1981638129260021-9355Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

16 

T S Rajagopal P Kanse Percutaneous Fixation for Pipkin type II Femoral head fracture associated with posterior dislocation of the hip.SICOT Online Report E0452003



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.