• Article highlight
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Metrics




Downlaod Files

   


Article Access statistics

Viewed: 1184

PDF Downloaded: 852


Get Permission Prakash, Kumar, Kumar, and Rajput: The prophylactic use of antibiotic coated intramedullary nail in treatment of open tibia fractures


Introduction

Fractures of the tibia are the most common long bone fractures. Open injuries of tibia account for almost 50% of all open injuries and are more prone to infection than other long bones.1, 2 The annual incidence of open injuries is 11.5 per 100,000 with 40% occurring in the lower limb, commonly in the tibia shaft.3, 4, 5, 6 These usually result from high-energy injuries and are frequently associated with polytrauma, high rates of infection and other complications which may threaten the limb and occasionally life and are generally a therapeutic challenge to the orthopedic surgeon.7 Damage to the soft tissue and vasculature surrounding the bone is the main cause for non union.8, 9 After using advance surgical techniques and antibiotics, there are chances of wound infection and osteomylitis. In Gustilo grade III open fractures, rate of deep infection is about 80%.9 According to other studies, on increasing grades of Gustilo the chances of infection increases. The effectiveness of systemic antibiotics is limited in reducing risk of infection with use of prosthesis and osteosynthetic devices.10, 11 Once implant gets infected, then it requires implant removal, debridement and long term antibiotic therapy. This implant related infection is prevented by delivering the antibiotics locally acting on tissue implant interface. One of such method is using a polylactic acid (PLA) coated intramedullary nail releasing gentamicin.8, 11 There are several studies showing reduction in implant related infection using antibiotic coated implants.12, 13

Materials and Methods

This prospective study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics, U.P. University of Medical Sciences, Saifai. 30 patients were treated over a period of 18 months from January 2018 to August 2019 with gentamicin coated tibia interlocking nail after taking written and informed consent.

Patients included in study were adults (>18years of age) having Gustilo type I, II and type III A compound tibia shaft fractures manageable with intramedullary nailing and excluded were (i) Gustilo type III B, III C, (ii)Females who were pregnant, breast-feeding or planning to become pregnant during the study, (iii)Patients with consumptive or malignant primary disease, (iv)Vascular compromised patients, (v)Patients suffering from neuropathy and (vi) A known allergy to used antibiotic.

In this study antibiotic coated tibia interlocking nail with property of sustained release of gentamicin was used. The coating contains combination of gentamicin and biodegradable polymeric carrier Poly (D, L-Lactide). An average size nail carries 100 mg (1 mg/cm2) gentamicin drug. Protocols given by ethical committee were strictly followed.

Any life threatening conditions assessed and treated pre-operatively. After performing pre-anesthetic check up, all patients were operated under spinal/epidural anesthesia. Patient was painted and sterile draping done. Knee flexed to 90o and entry point was made from the bare area over the tibial tuberosity under image intensifier (Figure 1). After passing the guide wire, serial reaming was done (Figure 2). Appropriate size of antibiotic coated nail measured and inserted into the medullary canal (Figure 3). I.V. antibiotics were given for 5 days post-operatively. Patient followed post-operatively at 1,2,3 and 6 months for outcome assessment.

Figure 1

Making entry point

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/f6059ef9-3b7e-48fb-b5c4-04a80e3bcebc/image/83cc7408-e8e9-469d-b986-48922c5555b5-uimage.png

Figure 2

Reaming

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/f6059ef9-3b7e-48fb-b5c4-04a80e3bcebc/image/eb5a1332-0731-4282-b61b-b7de9a5c5224-uimage.png

Figure 3

Insertion of nail

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/f6059ef9-3b7e-48fb-b5c4-04a80e3bcebc/image/dc8ebac6-57e5-4c5d-a427-55b2459c47ac-uimage.png

Figure 4

Grade II open fracture

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/f6059ef9-3b7e-48fb-b5c4-04a80e3bcebc/image/61190504-c547-4573-be9c-1e12dd7a1c34-uimage.png

Figure 5

Pre-op x ray

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/f6059ef9-3b7e-48fb-b5c4-04a80e3bcebc/image/8669ad85-09d1-437f-b093-a5091b9c8653-uimage.png

Figure 6

Fracture union after 8 weeks

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/f6059ef9-3b7e-48fb-b5c4-04a80e3bcebc/image/a6b1fb15-b4d4-46dd-9508-f31ecce41a34-uimage.png

Figure 7

Range of motion

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/f6059ef9-3b7e-48fb-b5c4-04a80e3bcebc/image/c9f74d7c-992b-4353-8559-afff7e6d1968-uimage.png

Results

All 30 patients (25 males and 5 females) were followed up for minimum of six months duration. The radiological Union was assessed using RUST Score (Table 1) and clinical assessment results were graded as excellent, good, fair and poor (Table 2). The study comprised 76.7% of the patients between 18-40 years of age and 23.3% of the patients between 41-60 years of age. In this study, there was predominance of male population. Males were 83.3% against females 16.7% (Table 3). The most common cause of injury was found to be due to road traffic accident and accounted for 80% of cases. Fibula fracture was associated with 93.3% of patients. Time taken in wound healing in majority of patients was less than 5 weeks (50.0%) (Table 4). Majority of patents (53.33%) had RUST score 8 at six months of duration (Table 5). Two cases got infected in this study and in one case there was non union. Average duration of hospital stay was 16 days. Large numbers of patients had fair outcome- 53.33% (Table 6).

Table 1

Radiological union scale in tibial (RUST) fractures.

Score per cortex Callus Fracture line
1 Absent Visible
2 Present Visible
3 Present Invisible

[i] Minimum score of 4: not healed; Maximum score of 12: completely healed

Table 2

Criteria for assessment of the result

S. No. Variable Excellent Good Fair Poor
1 Infection at 4 weeks Control Control Control Not Control
2 Wound healed at 5 weeks 7 weeks 10 weeks Not Healed
3 Radiological union at 6 month (RUST Score) 12 score 10 score 8 score 4 score
4 Weight bearing without pain at 6 months Yes Yes No No
5 Neurovascular complication Absent Absent Absent +/-
6 Patient compliance Very good Good Fair Poor

[i]

Table 3

Sex distribution

Sex Frequency %
Male 25 83.33%
Female 5 16.67%
Total 30 100%

Table 4

Time taken in wound healing

Time taken in wound healing in weeks Frequency %
≤5 weeks 15 50.00%
5-7 weeks 10 33.33%
8-10 weeks 3 10.00%
Not healed 2 06.67%
Total 30 100%

Table 5

Radiological union at six month (RUST score)

Radiological union at 6 month(RUST score) Frequency Percentage
4 3 10.00%
8 16 53.33%
10 8 26.67%
12 3 10.00%
Total 30 100%

Table 6

Clinical outcome

Functional outcome Frequency %
Excellent 3 10.00%
Good 8 26.67%
Fair 16 53.33%
Poor 3 10.00%
Total 30 100%

Discussion

Management of open shaft tibial fractures have been a therapeutic challenge since past. The goal of orthopedic surgeon is to decrease the infection rate and improve fracture healing after surgical treatment of open tibial shaft fractures reducing the complications. By providing stable internal fixation with intramedullary nail, motion of adjacent joints and early rehabilitation can be started; thus preventing the frequent problem of joint stiffness.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic-coated intramedullary locking nail in the compound tibia fractures and comparing the results with those in literature.

This study comprised of 30 patients, out of them 15 patients (50.00%) had grade-I, 13 patients (43.33%) had grade-II and two patients (06.67%) had grade-III compounding. In a study by Bhanu Pratap et al.14 13 (52%) cases were of grade-I fractures and 12 (48%) cases were others. In other study by Khaled Hamed et al.15 also exhibited eight (72.72%) patients had Gustilo type I fracture while three (27.27%) patients had type II fracture.

Out of 30 patients, fracture union was achieved in 29 (96.67%) patients and only one patient (03.33%) patient undergone non union. This was in accordance with the study of Bhanu Pratap et al.14 and Thomas Fuchs et al.16 where none of the patient undergone non union.

Average time of wound healing in our study was 4.11 weeks.

In a study of 25 patients by Bhanu Pratap et al.,14 infection in two (8.0%) patients were observed. In a similar study Thomas Fuchs et al.,16 out of 19 patients noticed infection in only one (5.26%) patient. These findings are consistent with the findings of our study where in a group of 30 patients, infection was found only in two patients.

At the end of this study, out of 30 patients, three (10%) patients had excellent outcome, 24 (80.00%) had good to fair and only three (10.00%) patients had poor outcome.

Conclusion

Antibiotic coated tibia interlocking nail is a good treatment option for open tibial fractures, yields good functional outcome with less complications in these fractures and should be used whenever indicated.

This prospective study was conducted in a small cohort of patients. Patient demographic and fracture pattern characteristics were random and not specified by the protocol. Furthermore compound grade IIIB and grade IIIC fractures were excluded from study and duration of follow up was also less.

Randomized controlled trials with large sample size and longer duration of follow up are needed to devise a standard treatment protocol for management of open tibia fractures.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

B Littenberg L P Weinstein M Mccarren T Mead M F Swiontkowski S A Rudicel Closed fractures of the tibial shaft: a Smeta- analysis of three methods of treatmentJ Bone Jt Surg19980217483

2 

M J Patzakis J Wilkins Factors Influencing Infection Rate in Open Fracture WoundsClin Orthop Relat Res198924336400009-921XOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

3 

C.M. Court-Brown S. Rimmer U. Prakash M.M. McQueen The epidemiology of open long bone fracturesInj1998297529340020-1383Elsevier BV

4 

Charles M. Court-Brown Kate E. Bugler Nicholas D. Clement Andrew D. Duckworth Margaret M. McQueen The epidemiology of open fractures in adults. A 15-year reviewInj201243689170020-1383Elsevier BV

5 

M Howard Epidemiology and management of open fractures of the lower limbBr J Hosp Med199757115827

6 

Nathan N. O'Hara Rodney Mugarura Gerard P. Slobogean Maryse Bouchard The Orthopaedic Trauma Patient Experience: A Qualitative Case Study of Orthopaedic Trauma Patients in UgandaPLoS ONE2014910e1109401932-6203Public Library of Science (PLoS)

7 

R B Gustilo J T Anderson Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bonesJ Bone Jt Surg197658445380021-9355Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

8 

Thomas Fuchs Gerhard Schmidmaier Michael J. Raschke Richard Stange Bioactive-Coated Implants in Trauma SurgeryEur J Trauma Emerg Surg20083416081863-9933, 1863-9941Springer Science and Business Media LLC

9 

C. Gaebler U. Berger P. Schandelmaier M. Greitbauer H. H. Schauwecker B. Applegate Rates and Odds Ratios for Complications in Closed and Open Tibial Fractures Treated With Unreamed, Small Diameter Tibial Nails: A Multicenter Analysis of 467 CasesJ Orthop Trauma2001156415230890-5339Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

10 

Michael Diefenbeck Thomas Mückley Gunther O Hofmann Prophylaxis and treatment of implant-related infections by local application of antibioticsInj2006372S95S1040020-1383Elsevier BV

11 

G. Schmidmaier B. Wildemann A. Stemberger N. P. Haas M. Raschke Biodegradable poly(D,L-lactide) coating of implants for continuous release of growth factorsJ Biomed Mater Res2001584449550021-9304, 1097-4636Wiley

12 

Gerhard Schmidmaier Martin Lucke Britt Wildemann Norbert P Haas Michael Raschke Prophylaxis and treatment of implant-related infections by antibiotic-coated implants: a reviewInj2006372S105120020-1383Elsevier BV

13 

M Lucke G Schmidmaier S Sadoni B Wildemann R Schiller N.P Haas Gentamicin coating of metallic implants reduces implant-related osteomyelitis in ratsBone2003325521318756-3282Elsevier BV

14 

Bhanu Pratap Aashish Gaur Vinay Joshi Functional outcome of antibiotic coated interlocking intramedullary nail in open tibia diaphyseal fractureInt J Orthop Sci20195280372395-1958AkiNik Publications

15 

K H Salem Critical analysis of tibial fracture healing following unreamed nailingInt Orthop201236714717

16 

Thomas Fuchs Richard Stange Gerhard Schmidmaier Michael J. Raschke The use of gentamicin-coated nails in the tibia: preliminary results of a prospective studyArch Orthop Trauma Surg2011131101419250936-8051, 1434-3916Springer Science and Business Media LLC



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.