• Article highlight
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 03-11-2021

Accepted : 29-12-2021



Article Metrics




Downlaod Files

   


Article Access statistics

Viewed: 510

PDF Downloaded: 358


Get Permission Jee and Kumar: Muscle pedicle bone graft in ununited fracture neck of femur in children


Introduction

AK Gupta et al. in a clinical study of 32 patients 14 to 62 years reported union in 89.5%. The results were excellent in 15 cases, good in 4 cases and poor in 6 cases. Ununited fracture neck of femur in children and adolescent is a common problem in developing countries where treatment is often delayed. It is a challenging entity to address. The problem associated with delayed presentation are structural bone gap at the fracture site, poor osteogenic potential at fracture margins, hypovascularity of proximal fragment and interposed avascular scar tissue in between the fragment. Osteogenesis or osteosynthesis is the only option in this age group. Different treatment modalities available are open reduction and internal fixation with fibular grafting, valgus osteotomy with and without internal fixation and muscle pedicle bone graft with internal fixation. Although open reduction and internal fixation with or without bone grafting and valgus osteotomy do give acceptable result, the muscle pedicle bone graft has definitely an edge over them as it simultaneously addresses all the problems associated with ununited fracture neck of femur without disturbing proximal femoral anatomy.1 It bridges the structural bone gap, stimulates osteogenesis and improves vascularity of femoral head.2 The aim of anatomical reduction, stable fixation and augmented osteogenesis at fracture site is completely acheived by quadratus femoris muscle pedicle bone grafting with internal fixation resulting in accelerated union and better functional outcome.

Aims of the Study

Present study was undertaken to analyse the result of muscle pedicle bone graft in ununited fracture neck of femur in children and adolescents.

Material and Methods

Sixteen patients of ununited fracture neck of femur (presenting late i.e. more than 3 weeks) in the children and adolescent were treated with quadratus femoris based muscle pedicle bone graft with internal fixation between 2004 to 2019. Pathological fracture, recent fracture and compound fracture were excluded from study. Mean age was 14.25 years (standard deviation 1.27 and range 12 to 16 years). Boys dominated our series (n=10 i.e. 62.50%) and right side was more commonly involved (n=12 i.e.75%). All of them were investigated for their fitness for spinal block or general anaesthesia. Steps of procedure including patient positioning, surgical procedure, provisional fixation and definitive fixation were discussed and documented. Radiographic evaluation included A-P View in 15 degree internal rotation, and Lateral view. Average delay in presentation was 5.88 weeks (range was 3-10 weeks). We had 02 transepiphyseal, 11 transcervical and 3 cervicotrochanteric fracture in our series. All the fractures were displaced and having some absorption of femoral neck.

Surgical Procedure

Spinal block was used in the procedure. Prone position on fracture table with radiolucent top was used. Fracture site was exposed through posterior approach and sclerosed margins of the fragments were freshened. Fracture was reduced with appropriate neck shaft angle and fixed with Moors pin/ knowels pin or 4 mm /7mm partially threaded cancellous screws. Any rotation or tilt was corrected. The fixation was augmented with quadratus femoris muscle pedicle bone graft harvested from intertochateric crest area with a bone pedicle of length 2 cm, width 1 cm and depth 1 cm. The graft was secured to the proximal femoral head fragment with 3.5mm cortical screw or 4mm cannulated cancellous screw. Soft tissue closure was done over drain.

Postoperative Care

First dressing change was done on third postoperative day and drain was removed at the same time. Sutures were removed on 14th day. Usually on 5th postoperative day quadriceps exercises was started. Non weight bearing was ensured for 4 months or till radiological union.

Followup

Patients were followed up at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8weeksk, regularly at 6 week interval for next 6 month and then at three month interval up to two year. Radiographic analysis was performed at each follow up with special attention to extent of callus formation, alignment of fragments and hard ware integrity.

Table 1

Shows age distribution of the patient

Age of patient (year)

No. of patient (%)

12 -13 years

03 (18.75)

13.1-14 years

04 (25.00)

14.1-15 years

02 (12.50)

15.1-16 years

07(43.75)

Table 2

Shows radiological classification

Radiological type

No. of patient (%)

Transepiphyseal

02(12.5)

Transcervical

11(68.75)

Cervicotrochanteric

03(18.75)

Table 3

Shows delay in presentatiom

Delay (weeks)

No. of patient (%)

3

02(12.50)

4

02(12.50)

5

04(25.00)

6

04(25.00)

7

02(12.50)

8

01(06.25)

9

01(06.25)

Table 4

Shows time of radiological union

Time in weeks

No. of patients (%)

16– 20

04(25.00)

21- 24

06 (37.50)

25 -28

04 (25.00)

29-32

01 (06.25)

Non-union

01 (06.25)

Table 5

Shows complications encountered in our series

Complications encountered

No. of patients (%)

Infection

00 (00.00)

Coxa vara

02 (12.50)

Nonunion

01 (06.25)

Premature closure of physis

00 (00.00)

Osteonecrosis

02 (12.50)

Chondrolysis

00 (00.00)

Shortening

02 (12.50)

Observation

The result was analysed using Harris hip score and graded as excellent, good, fair and poor.

Table 6

Result

Harris hip Score

No. of patients (%)

Excellent

90-100

11(68.75)

Good

80-89

02 (12.50)

Fair

70-79

02 (12.50)

poor

< 70

01(06.25)

Figure 1

Case 1: Preoperative x-ray

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/b4bb4395-ca3f-4fe5-ac24-5e2bba851eceimage1.jpeg

Figure 2

Case 1: Postoperative at 6 weeks

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/b4bb4395-ca3f-4fe5-ac24-5e2bba851eceimage2.jpeg

Figure 3

Case 1: Postoperative x-ray at 10 week AP view

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/b4bb4395-ca3f-4fe5-ac24-5e2bba851eceimage3.jpeg

Figure 4

Case 1: Postoperative x-ray at 10 week lateral view

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/b4bb4395-ca3f-4fe5-ac24-5e2bba851eceimage4.jpeg

Figure 5

Case 1: Postoperative at 16 weeks

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/b4bb4395-ca3f-4fe5-ac24-5e2bba851eceimage5.jpeg

Figure 6

Case 1: Postoperative at 20 weeks

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/b4bb4395-ca3f-4fe5-ac24-5e2bba851eceimage6.jpeg

Figure 7

Case 1 : Clinical photograph postoperative at 20 weeks

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/686230c5-9b97-44c5-a0fa-c23de55ad694/image/d0065d5a-ad86-4c3b-bcb2-3b4b4d1118e9-uimage.png

Figure 8

Case 1: Clinical photograph at 20 weeks postoperative

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/686230c5-9b97-44c5-a0fa-c23de55ad694/image/f8bda6d0-bf69-4190-b0e8-769b1afe8ed1-uimage.png

Figure 9

Case 2: Preoperative x-ray

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/b4bb4395-ca3f-4fe5-ac24-5e2bba851eceimage7.jpeg

Figure 10

Case 2: Postoperative at 10 weeks

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/b4bb4395-ca3f-4fe5-ac24-5e2bba851eceimage8.jpeg

Figure 11

case 2: Postoperative x-ray at 16 weeks

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/b4bb4395-ca3f-4fe5-ac24-5e2bba851eceimage9.jpeg

Figure 12

Case 2: Clinical photograph

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/686230c5-9b97-44c5-a0fa-c23de55ad694/image/4179f983-7c4d-4da1-9203-074b831f25e6-uimage.png

Figure 13

Case 2: Clinical photograph

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/686230c5-9b97-44c5-a0fa-c23de55ad694/image/4e471d8e-b6c4-4b06-b63d-be5287955ac2-uimage.png

Figure 14

Case 2 : Clinical photograph

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/686230c5-9b97-44c5-a0fa-c23de55ad694/image/6d7c9b2a-b198-4768-a904-084b7694e44d-uimage.png

Figure 15

Case 3: Postoerative X-ray

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/b4bb4395-ca3f-4fe5-ac24-5e2bba851eceimage10.jpeg
Figure 16

Case 4: Coxa vara with bending of implant

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/b4bb4395-ca3f-4fe5-ac24-5e2bba851eceimage11.jpeg

Discussion

Delayed presntation of fracture neck of Femur in paedriatic age group is not uncommon in developing countries. Meyers Muscle pedicle bone graft has been a well recommended procedure for fracture neck non- union in adult with union rate of 95%.3 Subtrochanteric valgus osteotomy in paedriatic age groups give variable result. 4

Delima DF et al., in a clinical study of 16 patients with ununited transcervical femoral fractures, age 12 to 40 years treated with open reduction and internal fixation with Meyers muscle pedicle graft reported radiological union in 13 patients.5

AK Gupta et al in a clinical study of 32 patients aged 14 to 62 years reported union in 89.5%. The results were excellent in 15 cases, good in 4 cases and poor in 6 cases. Complications like Avascular necrosis (n=2), transient foot drop (n=2), coxa vara (n=1) were noted in the study.2

Harun Yasin Tuzun et al. in his series of 16 patients has reported radiological union at average of 7 months and only one patient (6%) had avascular necrosis.6

In our series of sixteen cases we had 68.75% (n=11) excellent, 12.50% (n=2) good, 12.50 (n=2) fair and 06.25% (n=1) poor result.

Conclusion

Muscle pedicle bone graft with internal fixation has proved to be an efficient method of treatment of ununited fracture neck of femur in children and adolescent as it improves the vascularity of femoral head, bridges the structural gap at fracture site and enhances osteosynthesis at fracture site simultaneously without altering the anatomy of proximal femur.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

1 

AK Gupta S Rastogi R Nath Internal fixation and muscle pedicle bone grafting in femoral neck fracturesIndian J Orthop20084213942

2 

DP Baksi Internal fixation of ununited femoral neck fractures combined with muscle-pedicle bone graftingJ Bone Joint Surg Br198668223945

3 

MH Meyers JP Harvey TM Moore The muscle pedicle bone graft in the treatment of displaced fractures of femoral neck: indications, operative technique and resultsOrthop Clin North Am19745477992

4 

AHC Ratliff Fractures of the neck of the femur in childrenJ Bone Joint Surg (Br)196244-B352842

5 

D F Delima D D Tanna The quadrates femoris graft in old transcervical femoral fracturesJ Postgrad Med198935315256

6 

HY Tuzun S Türkkan Ö Erşen A Arsenishvili M Kürklü results of quadratus femoris muscle pedicle grafting (Meyers procedure in the management of ununited femoral neck fracturesHip Int 20213145627



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.