• Article highlight
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 25-01-2024

Accepted : 01-02-2024



Article Metrics




Downlaod Files

   


Article Access statistics

Viewed: 439

PDF Downloaded: 262


Get Permission Kulkarni, Kulkarni, Kulkarni, Deshpande, and Kulkarni: Long term trends in the incidence of distal radius fractures in Sindhudurg, west coast of Maharashtra Retrospective analysis of 1776 distal radius fractures (1989 to 1999), hospital based study


Introduction

Distal radius fracture is the commonest fracture encountered by every orthopaedic surgeon. The data base by the same author and from the same institute determined that 12% of all emergency department visits were due to distal radius fractures.1

The distal radius fracture has a bimodal distribution, with peak incidence in adolescents2 and in elderly patients3 including low energy falls in both.4 In contrast high energy trauma distal radius fractures are seen in young adults.5

Adolescents are particularly at high risk for distal radius fractures, due to rapidly growing long bones at puberty. There is a large dissociation between skeletal growth and mineralization during puberty. This accounted for increased fragility with additional cortical porosity of radius, metaphysis.6 In turn contributing peak incidence of distal radius fractures seen during this period of rapid physiological development.

Distal radius fractures account up to 18% of all fractures in above 60 years of age group. Out of numerous risk contributing factors the major cause being architectural changes in bone with osteopenia and osteoporosis.7

Multiple huge numbers of epidemiological studies have been done in western hemisphere for distal radius fractures. But little data is available in Indian population and surprisingly negligible documentation from Maharashtra regarding the incidence.

This hospital based retrospective study, with epidemiological data from Sindhudurg, Kokan region of Maharashtra aims to fill this paucity of knowledge for Indian population. This documentation reports about the incidence of age and sex profiles with secular trends and seasonal variations over a decade period in the catchment area of Government. Hospital, Kudal, Sindhudurg.

Materials and Methods

There are thirty-nine primary health centres, six rural hospitals, three sub district hospitals and one district hospital under technical and administrative control of District Civil Surgeon, Sindhudurg. The patients with distal radius fractures seek medical attention at Government hospital, Kudal as it is the only public hospital rendering full time Orthopaedic services, with largest orthopaedic outpatient clinic and indoor patients in Sindhudurg between 1989 to 1999.

For this study report a formal review and approval by appropriate institutional review board from District Civil Hospital Oros, Sindhudurg was obtained. For this observational retrospective study, identifiable human material, data from district hospital records, informed consents for its collection, & storage has been done.

The Government hospital outpatient registers and indoor case papers, operation theatre rosters and radiology documentations were studied retrospectively. All distal radius fractures treated by the author at one single centre of Government Hospital in Sindhudurg were included in this report. Patients primarily treated at other hospital, but followed in our hospital are also included in this report. To be included in this study report the distal radius fracture patient has to live in the catchment area of Sindhudurg district. Geographically, this is the southernmost district of Maharashtra state with adjoining border line district of Karnataka and Goa states. Hence the patients of Karnataka and Goa states treated at this district hospital, who were not the residents of Sindhudurg, are excluded from this study. The period of observation was from 1989 to 1999. The demographic features like age, sex, side of fracture along with Frykman classification of fracture with treatment modalities were recorded from the hospital data. As the rains are heavy in Sindhudurg, South kokan coastal region, the seasonal variation for occurrence of this fracture is also calculated. The population at risk was 832152 in 1989 and 847283 in 1999 which is the actual number of inhabitants in Sindhudurg. (Censes of India Series-28; 2001) The age and gender distribution of the catchment area of Government hospital, Kudal was available from Census population studies of Government of Maharashtra and district health office of Zillah Parishad, Sindhudurg. (Primary censes abstract 28 part XII-B; 2011).

The annual incidence, specified per 10,000 population person years was then calculated. Calculation of confidence limits for age specific incidence was performed. Comparison between categorical variables was done with x2 test. T tests were used to compare groups with normally distributed continuous variables. Statistical significance was considered for p values < 0.05 and all tests were two-sided.

Results

1776 Patients with distal radius fracture were identified in this study. 692(39.0%) of them were women. Median age in men was 49 (0-94) years and 52(0-95) years for women. Right hand was involved in 1286(72.4%) patients. 796(44.8%) fractures occurred due to falls outdoors and 544(30.6%) indoor falls. The road traffic accidents and high velocity injuries accounted for 436(24.5%).

Distal radius fracture with ulnar styloid fracture (Frykman Type 2, 4, 6 and 8) occurred in 912(51.4%). There was much of gender difference with preponderance of males in occurrence of fractures with ulnar styloid, males 554 (60.7%) and females 358 (39.3%). Fractures with ulnar styloid fracture were treated by surgical intervention in 522(57.2%) and with intact ulnar styloid in 186(21.5%).

Out of total 1776 fractures 1068 (60.1%) were treated conservatively and 708 (39.9%) with surgical intervention.

The age and sex incidence of distal radius fractures are shown in (Table 2, Table 3). The incidence 26(22.1%) in 1989 and 56(25.4%) in 1999 increased with steep rise in 11 to 20 years in both sexes. Another high rise in incidence of fracture 37(31.4%) in 1989 and 82(37.2%) in 1999 was seen both men and women between 51 to 70 years of age without any tendency of levelling off even at higher ages. After the age of 71 years, in very elderly patients there was a gradual continuous, sustained decrease in the incidence of fractures in both men 128(11.8%) and women 125(18.1%).

Table 1

Distal radius fractures between 1989 to 1999 forwomen

S. No.

Age in years

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

1

0-10

2 (3.9%)

3 (5.8%)

2 (3.6%)

3 (5.0%)

3 (4.4%)

4 (5.6%)

3 (3.9%)

2 (2.5%)

4 (4.3%)

4 (4.0%)

3 (2.8%)

2

11-20

12 (23.5%)

14 (27.4%)

13 (23.6%)

15 (25.0%)

18 (26.4%)

19 (26.7%)

21 (27.6%)

22 (27.1%)

23 (25.2%)

25 (24.7%)

27 (26.2%)

3

21-30

4 (7.8%)

2 (3.9%)

3 (5.4%)

4 (6.6%)

3 (4.4%)

5 (7.04%)

4 (5.2%)

5 (6.1%)

6 (6.6%)

7 (6.9%)

8 (6.9%)

4

31-40

3 (5.8%)

3 (5.8%)

4 (7.2%)

3 (5.0%)

5 (7.3%)

4 (5.6%)

6 (7.8%)

5 (6.1%)

6 (6.6%)

6 (5.9%)

9 (7.7%)

5

41-50

4 (7.8%)

4 (7.8%)

5 (9.1%)

3 (5.0%)

4 (5.9%)

4 (5.6%)

5 (6.5%)

6 (7.4%)

7 (7.7%)

6 (5.9%)

8 (6.9%)

6

51-60

8 (15.6%)

9 (17.6%)

10 (18.2%)

12 (18.3%)

13 (19.1%)

12 (19.6%)

14 (18.4%)

16 (19.7%)

17 (18.7%)

18 (17.8%)

20 (17.2%)

7

61-70

9 (17.6%)

8 (15.6%)

9 (16.3%)

10 (16.6%)

11 (16.1%)

11 (18.0%)

13 (17.1%)

15 (18.5%)

17 (18.7%)

19 (18.8%)

22 (19.0%)

8

71-80

5 (9.8%)

4 (7.8%)

3 (5.4%)

5 (8.3%)

4 (5.9%)

6 (8.4%)

5 (6.5%)

4 (4.9%)

4 (4.4%)

5 (4.9%)

6 (5.1%)

9

81-90

2 (3.9%)

2 (3.9%)

3 (5.4%)

3 (5.0%)

4 (5.9%)

2 (2.8%)

3 (3.9%)

3 (3.7%)

4 (4.4%)

6 (5.9%)

7 (6.0%)

10

91-100

2 (3.9%)

2 (3.9%)

3 (5.4%)

2 (3.3%)

3 (4.4%)

4 (5.6%)

2 (2.6%)

3 (3.7%)

3 (3.3%)

5 (4.9%)

6 (5.1%)

Total

51

51

55

60

68

71

76

81

91

101

116

Table 2

Distal radius fractures between 1989 to 1999 for Men

S. No

Age in years

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

1

0-10

2 (3.0%)

4 (5.2%)

3 (4.0%)

4 (4.93)

4 (4.7%)

5 (5.5%)

4 (4.5%)

3 (3.4%)

3 (3.1%)

2 (2.0%)

4 (3.8%)

2

11-20

14 (20.9%)

16 (20.8%)

22 (29.0%)

24 (29.6%)

23 (26.7%)

21 (23.1%)

20 (22.7%)

24 (27.0%)

26 (27.3%)

28 (27.7%)

29 (27.9%)

3

21-30

5 (7.5%)

6 (7.8%)

4 (5.3%)

5 (6.2%)

6 (7.0%)

7 (7.7%)

6 (6.9%)

5 (4.5%)

4 (4.2%)

5 (4.9%)

5 (4.2%)

4

31-40

6 (8.9%)

5 (6.5%)

6 (7.9%)

2 (2.5%)

4 (4.6%)

6 (6.6%)

7 (8.0%)

6 (6.7%)

7 (7.4%)

6 (5.9%)

8 (7.7%)

5

41-50

8 (11.9%)

7 (9.1%)

4 (5.3%)

2 (2.5%)

5 (5.8%)

8 (8.8%)

8 (9.1%)

8 (9.0%)

9 (9.5%)

7 (6.9%)

8 (7.7%)

6

51-60

9 (13.43)

12 (15.6%)

16 (21.1%)

17 (21.00%)

14 (16.3%)

17 (18.6%)

15 (17.0%)

17 (19.1%)

18 (18.9%)

20 (19.8%)

21 (20.2%)

7

61-70

11 (16.41)

14 (18.2%)

12 (15.8%)

15 (18.5%)

13 (15.1%)

16 (17.6%)

17 (19.3%)

16 (18.0%)

17 (17.9%)

21 (20.8%)

19 (18.3%)

8

71-80

7 (10.4%)

5 (6.5%)

4 (5.3%)

6 (7.4%)

7 (8.1%)

8 (8.8%)

6 (6.9%)

3 (3.3%)

6 6.3%)

4 (4.0%)

3 (2.9%)

9

81-90

4 (6.00%)

5 (6.5%)

3 (4.0%)

4 (5.0%)

5 (5.8%)

2 (2.2%)

4 (4.5%)

4 (4.4%)

3 (3.1%)

4 (4.0%)

4 (3.8%)

10

91-100

1 (1.5%)

3 (3.9%)

2 (2.6%)

2 (2.4%)

5 (5.8%)

1 (1.1%)

1 (1.1%)

3 (3.3%)

2 (2.1%)

4 (4.0%)

3 (2.9%)

Total

67

77

76

81

86

91

88

89

95

101

104

For both the sexes, there was an age dependent decrease in the proportion of distal radius fractures, in men 12(17.9%) and women 9(17.6%) in 1989 where as in 1999 men constituted 10(9.61%) and women 19(16.4%) caused by low energy trauma. In both men and women less than 15% of all fractures above 70 years of age were considered to be of this type.

There was a considerable seasonal variation in distal radius fracture incidence, with a culmination during rainy season months, from June to September, of every year (Table 3). In fact during this rainy season, 441(40.7%) in men and 304 (43.9%) in women, fractures occurred compared to 514(47.4%) in men and 517(74%) in women during non-rainy season, winter and summer of October to May. This seasonal dependence was more prominently seen in elderly individuals of both sexes and also in adolescent girls and boys between 11 to 20 years of age.

Table 3

Distal radius fracture incidence with seasonal variation

June to September Rainy Season

October to May Winter & Summer Season

Men

Women

Men

Women

1989

32 (47.8%)

21 (41.2%)

35 (52.2%)

30 (58.8%)

1990

37 (48.1%)

23 (45.1%)

40 (51.9%0)

28 (54.9%)

1991

35 (46.1%)

25 (45.5%)

41 (53.9%)

30 (54.5%)

1992

38 (46.9%)

23 (38.3%)

43 (53.1%)

37 (61.7%)

1993

39 (45.3%)

22 (32.4%)

47 (54.7%)

46 (67.6%)

1994

41 (45.1%)

24 (33.8%)

50 (54.9%)

47 (66.2%)

1995

40 (45.5%)

23 (30.3%)

48 (54.5%)

53 (69.7%)

1996

42 (47.2%)

25 (30.9%)

47 (52.8%)

56 (69.1%)

1997

42 (44.2%)

28 (30.8%)

53 (55.8%)

63 (69.2%)

1998

46 (45.5%)

42 (41.6%)

55 (54.5%)

59 (58.4%)

1999

49 (47.1%)

48 (41.4%)

55 (52.9%)

68 (58.6%)

Total

441 (40.7%)

304 (43.9%)

514 (47.4%)

517 (74.7%)

The annual incidence was 1.41 for 1989 and 2.58 for 1999 per 10,000 inhabitants. The annual incidence for women in 1989 was 1.15 and 2.69 in 1999 per 10,000 population. Similarly, for men in 1989 it was 1.72 and 0.24 in 1999 per 10,000 population. (Table 4, Table 5)

Table 4

Annual incidence trend with age wise population calculated for beginning and end of study for women

Age group

Population

No of Fractures

Annual incidence rate per 10,000

1989

1999

1989

1999

1989

1999

0-10

60232

59086

2

3

0.33

0.50

11-20

74385

73074

12

27

1.61

3.69

21-30

63750

63753

4

8

0.62

1.25

31-40

67121

66075

3

9

0.44

1.36

41-50

59817

58141

4

8

0.66

1.37

51-60

45433

43884

8

20

1.76

4.55

61-70

44967

43246

9

22

2.00

5.08

71-80

21326

19559

5

6

2.45

3.06

81-90

4609

4418

2

7

4.33

15.84

91-100

1128

1083

2

6

17.73

55.40

Total

442768

431185

51

116

1.15

2.69

Table 5

Annual incidence trend with age wise population calculated for beginning and end of study for men

Age group

Population

No of Fractures

Annual incidence rate per 10,000

1989

1999

1989

1999

1989

1999

0-10

58897

63495

2

4

0.33 

0.62 

11-20

72486

76766

14

29

 1.93

 3.77

21-30

56043

62205

5

5

 0.89

 0.80

31-40

57266

61351

6

8

 1.04

 1.30

41-50

54987

57463

8

8

 1.45

 1.39

51-60

38641

40688

9

21

 2.32

 5.16

61-70

31874

33501

11

19

 3.45

 5.67

71-80

15327

17489

7

3

 4.56

1.71

81-90

3187

3590

4

4

 12.55

 11.14

91-100

676

784

1

3

 14.77

 38.26

Total

389384

416098

67

104

1.72

0.24

Discussion

The detailed data of this study, point to a continuous rise in the incidence of distal radius fracture in adolescent, elderly populations over a decade time. For adolescent population this increase can likely be attributed to a surge in longitudinal growth velocity with puberty spurt in both boys and girls.8 The increased incidence of fracture in elderly population may be due to continuous rise in active elderly men and women could be the direct related cause in this age group.

Females are more frequently affected from 63% to 84% which is supported by many studies from the west.9 In this study men have higher incidence rate than women, contrary to western literature. Similarly, in 11 to 20 years age group, adolescent boys were more frequently affected, when compared to girls of same age. This finding is in agreement with other studies from the west.10

The most common mode of injury in this study was low velocity injuries causing indoor and outdoor falls. This is similar to the reports of fall on outstretched hand in 65% and 79% as the commonest cause of fracture.11

Frykman type 1, 2,3,4,5 were the commonest types of fractures in this report. Many authors reported Frykman type 7, 8 are the commonest with a range of 68 to 80%. These studies mainly focussed young adults with high velocity injuries. Concomitant ulna fractures were found in half of patients in this study. Similar results were observed in previously published report of distal radius fracture by the same author from the same institute as needed for consistency with the new data.12

Among both men and women, we found an exponential increase in incidence between the ages of 51 to 70 years. It is well-established that post-menopausal women have an increased risk of distal radius fractures. This might be explained by reduced bone density and increased risk of osteoporosis. It is surprisingly seen in this report in men also between the same age group. Hence, it is necessary to think and give more attention for osteoporosis in physically active elderly males. Following this exponential increase incidence in both men and women, observed in this report unlike the other study populations of western hemisphere where the incidence continues to escalate with age. This difference could be due to the fact that elderly men and women in our population tend to be less physically active with age, all the while staying indoor, being nurtured by younger relatives at home, compared to western counterparts.13

The decreasing incidence of distal radius fracture, once past this peak of 51 to 70 years, which differs from previous studies, but similar to the study from west.14 But recent western literature depicts, increase in distal radius fracture above 70 years, indicating that very old people are living added active life style, more often than before.15

The vast majority of epidemiological studies of distal radius fractures are performed in the west. However, it is noticed that our patient profile differed totally from the published western literature prompting this study. This study results show higher proportion of males to females. This reflects the kind of activities of our male population engaged in agriculture, office work, manual labour with risk of indoor, outdoor falls and young males predominantly with more of two-wheeler motorcycle accidents. The ratio of male to female of this entire district vide study is in direct contrast to previous studies; show a predominantly older age group female patient profile.16 The reason in our country being males are generally the working populations, who get injured during work.17

The lateralizing predisposition for left side is documented in western literature in individuals whose dominant hand is right.18 Contrary to this, present study data differed that predominantly the right side was involved in nearly more than two third of the patients. This showed a great correlation between hand dominance and fracture site. The age distribution of our study population peaking at 51 to 70 years age group is in partial agreement with the studies of Asian countries.19

Only two other studies looked at fracture classification according to AO system.20 But our study was regarding Frykman classification system where in types 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 were the most common.

More than two-thirds of fractures in this report happen out doors which make the weather conditions as an important factor. A higher incidence of fractures in June to September, heavy rainy season months is reported, postulates as increased fracture risk. This is supported by high incidence of fractures during rainfall in the present study. A large proportion of patients in our population engaged in manual work in fields and house hold activities, construction work are affected with heavy rain fall. This risk of slipping in and around homes is maximum with seasonal weather, as compared to western literature of slipping on icy streets.21

The results of this study fill this insufficient knowledge expertise in epidemiology of a very common fracture. To our knowledge, there is scanty literature on this in Maharashtra, India as compared to large number of reports from west. Distal radius fractures occur in all age groups peaking at uniquely different ages in males and females. The mechanism of injury coordinates well with Frykman classification. In turn this classification correlates well with percentage of fractures treated by surgical intervention.

The data bares from the only Government hospital, serving largely practically to the whole of district, the documentations of hospital records cross-checked with more than a decade archives stand out among the various strengths of this study. However, this Government hospital during 1989 to 1999 period in this area of Sindhudurg district that treated all acute distal radius fractures and loss of patients to neighbouring hospitals from this Government hospital has been found to be insignificant.22

Several international studies, suggest an increasing tendency for operative treatment.23 Even though in this study, more than half of patients were treated conservatively, one fifth underwent surgical intervention. To the best of our knowledge we are unaware of any other extensive hospital based incidence data for distal radius fracture from Maharashtra state, India. In the absence of comparable data from other communities, in Maharashtra, it is difficult to demonstrate that Sindhudurg incidence rate reflect the situation nationally.

This epidemiological study of distal radius fracture helps the treating surgeon to select most appropriate treatment modality and also target preventive measures towards risk population. In Sindhudurg, Maharashtra state fall and fracture prevention programmes need to be developed for the elderly. Future studies are necessary to further monitor the changes and explore in deep the reasons in trend found in this study.

Interpretation

The crude distal radius fracture incidence rates in Sindhudurg have increased gradually over a decade time, more in men than women. The highest affected age group is 51 to 70 years in both men and women including adolescents, with increased secular trend from 1989 to 1999.

Author Contribution

Article Conception & Structuration: RSK, RRK & Ranjani R K, SRK, Literature search, analysis & manuscript drafting: RSD critical revision of manuscript content: RSK, SRK Conceived & designed protocol: RSK, SRK contributed for follow up of patients & analyzed X-rays: RSD, Ranjani RK, and integrity of data analysis. All authors revised the manuscript and contributed to the final manuscript.

Source of Funding

This research didn’t receive grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the outstanding technical assistance of Mrs. Suvarna Avasare of Physiology Dept., SSPM Medical College & Lifetime hospital Padave, Sindhudurg. Without her immense enthusiasm this never would have been written.

References

1 

RS Kulkarni Epidemiology of Colle’s FractureJ Maharashtra Orthop Assoc2006418993

2 

RA Faulkner KS Davison DA Bailey RL Mirwald AD Baxter-Jones Size-corrected BMD decreases during peak linear growth: implications for fracture incidence during adolescenceJ Bone Miner Res20062112186470

3 

MM Mcqueen CM Court-Brown Increasing age and fractures of the distal radiusCurr Orthop2003173608

4 

J Oyen CG Gjesdal C Brudvik LM Hove EM Apalset HC Gulseth Low-energy distal radius fractures in middle-aged and elderly men and women--the burden of osteoporosis and fracture risk : A study of 1794 consecutive patientsOsteoporos Int2010217125767

5 

JL Knirk JB Jupiter Intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius in young adultsJ Bone Joint Surg Am198668564759

6 

F Rauch C Neu F Manz E Schoenau The development of metaphyseal cortex--implications for distal radius fractures during growthJ Bone Miner Res2001168154755

7 

J Oyen C Brudvik CG Gjesdal GS Tell SA Lie LM Hove Osteoporosis as a risk factor for distal radial fractures: a case-control studyJ Bone Joint Surg Am201193434856

8 

CE DePutter EFV Beeck CWN Looman H Toet SER Hovius RW Selles Trends in wrist fractures in children and adolescents, 1997-2009J Hand Surg Am1997361118105

9 

MT Vogt JA Cauley MM Tomaino K Stone JR Williams JH Herndon Distal radius fractures in older women: a 10-year follow-up study of descriptive characteristics and risk factors. The study of osteoporotic fracturesJ Am Geriatr Soc200250197103

10 

CJ Blimkie J Lefevre GP Beunen R Renson PV Damme Fractures, physical activity, and growth velocity in adolescent Belgian boysMed Sci Sports Exerc19932578018

11 

MC Nevitt SR Cummings Type of fall and risk of hip and wrist fractures: the study of osteoporotic fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research GroupJ Am Geriatr Soc19934111122634

12 

RS Kulkarni Importance of fractured ulnar styloid in end results of unstable Colle’s fractures in young adultsJ Maharashtra Orthop Assoc20051236

13 

RS Kulkarni Colle’s fractures, review of 636 casesIndian J Orthop199327217983

14 

H Mallmin S Ljunghall Incidence of Colles' fracture in Uppsala. A prospective study of a quarter-million populationActa Orthop Scand19926322135

15 

AP Diamantopoulos G Rohde I Johnsrud IM Skoie M Hochberg G Haugeberg The epidemiology of low- and high-energy distal radius fracture in middle-aged and elderly men and women in Southern NorwayPLoS One201278e43367

16 

CE DeLaet HA Pols Fractures in the elderly: epidemiology and demographyBaillieres Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab20001421719

17 

RS Kulkarni How far have we progressed in nearly two centuries, since Colle’s published his classical description? Analysis of 4292 distal radius fracturesJ Maharashtra Orthop Assoc200915495500

18 

GR Pesola GA Feinberg H Ahsan Preferential distal radius fracture in right-handed individuals presenting to an EDAm J Emerg Med20032175525

19 

OT Koo DM Tan AK Chong Distal radius fractures: an epidemiological reviewOrthop Surg20135320913

20 

J Rundgren A Bojan CM Navarro A Enocson Epidemiology, classification, treatment and mortality of distal radius fractures in adults: an observational study of 23,394 fractures from the national Swedish fracture registerBMC Musculoskelet Disord20202188

21 

AM Giladi MJ Shauver A Ho L Zhong HM Kim KC Chung Variation in the incidence of distal radius fractures in the U.S. elderly as related to slippery weather conditionsPlast Reconstr Surg2014133232132

22 

RS Kulkarni Long term result of unstable fracture lower end of radius in young adult treated conservatively, 6-14 year follow up of 296 patientsJ Orthop Assoc South Indian States20107509

23 

MK Wilcke H Hammarberg PY Adolphson Epidemiology and changed surgical treatment methods for fractures of the distal radius: a registry analysis of 42,583 patients in Stockholm County, Sweden, 2004–2010Acta Orthop200458332926



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.