• Article highlight
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 14-09-2024

Accepted : 02-11-2024



Article Metrics




Downlaod Files

   


Article Access statistics

Viewed: 123

PDF Downloaded: 42


Get Permission Yadav, Ravindran, Vardhan, and Jyothsna: A prospective study to evaluate the outcome of periarthritis shoulder treated with platelet rich plasma


Introduction

Periarthritis shoulder also called as Adhesive capsulitis or Frozen shoulder.1, 2, 3 The body creates excessive adhesion across the glenohumeral joint as a result of the idiopathic, chronic, and indolent degenerative process known as periarthritis shoulder, which causes discomfort, stiffness, and a reduction in range of motion.4, 5, 6, 3 It often appears between the ages of 40 and 70. In the general population, the prevalence of adhesive capsulitis is 3-55%, and it is 20% in those with diabetes.7, 8, 9 Many types of treatment have been employed in the treatment of shoulder disorder such as simple analgesia, NSAIDS, intraarticular steroid, platelet rich plasma injection and surgery.10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15

Although this condition is associated with a number of risk factors, including female sex, trauma, age more than 40, thyroid disease,diabetes, stroke, myocardial infarction, extended mobility andt the existence of an autoimmune disease, the pathophysiology of this disorder is yet unknown.1, 16, 17, 18, 19

It's usual to think of adhesive capsulitis as having three phases. The first stage, known as "freezing," is characterised by escalating discomfort and stiffness that may last up to nine months.20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 The second stage, referred to as "frozen," entails a constant condition for a duration of four to twenty month.26 The third stage, known as "thawing," is a time of spontaneous healing that may last anywhere between five and twenty-six months.27, 5, 28, 29

Among the suggested therapies are, intra-articular corticosteroid, benign neglect and hyaluronic acid injections, physical therapy , deep heat modalities, oral corticosteroids, manipulation under anaesthesia, surgical release and hydrodilation.30, 31, 32, 33, 34 However, the best treatment option is a mater of debate. Due to its physiological effects,USG therapy is used as a treatment, which include, an increase in capillary permeability,increase in blood flow and tissue metabolism, an increase in pain threshold , an improvement in tissue extensibility, and a change in neuromuscular activity that cause relaxation of muscle.35, 36, 37, 38, 39

One of the methods often used to treat periarthritis of the shoulder is intra-articular corticosteroid injection.40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 In order to enhance and speed up tendon recovery, PRP has become a novel technique. 46, 47, 48, 49 It is thought to promote the soft tissue revascularisation and growth factors concentration increase. 50, 51, 33, 52 It is described as an autologous blood sample with platelet concentrations exceeding reference levels. 18, 53, 54, 55, 56

Numerous cytokines and growth like FGF,VEGF PDGF, TGF-beta, EGF, IGF-2, PDGF, and IGF-1, may be found in platelet rich plasma. 57, 58, 59 One of the newer methods of treating this very painful and in capacitating disorder uses keratinocyte growth factors and connective tissue growth factors. 60, 61, 62, 63 Several studies have shown its potential when compared to steroid injection and other forms of conservative therapy. 5, 64, 19, 65

PRP is more efficient and long-lasting than cortisone injection for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis, according to several research. 66, 67, 34

The main ideology behind this project is introduction of platelet rich plasma as a biological agent promoting healing when used in the treatment of periarthritis shoulder.

Aims and Objectives

To evaluate thes outcome of periarthritis shoulder treated with platelet rich plasma in the form of:

  1. Intensity of pain reduced after the procedure

  2. Increase in shoulder joint degree of movements

  3. Ability of carrying daily activities without restrictions which the patients were not able to do before.

Materials and Methods

The research was done orthopaedic department of Narayana Medical College & Hospital, Nellore from November 2020 to June 2022 after getting ethical committee clearance.

Inclusion criteria

A total number of 30 patients in the age group of 35-60 years of either sex who are diagnosed with periarthritis shoulder for more than 4 weeks and not relieved by conservative treatment, patients with restricted active and passive movement at glenohumeral joint and patients giving informed consent for study were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Patients having chronic pain due to other causes like nerve damage or other neurological disorders, history of fracture around the shoulder joint, patients having local skin infection at the shoulder joint and patient not giving informed consent to be a part of study were excluded from the study and shoulderd pre procedure after 1 month, 3 months and at 6 months.

Figure 1

Visual analogue scale

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/3d16eb8e-7765-4f79-a5e8-2cf9b199421eimage1.png

Figure 2

Shoulder pain and disability index

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/3d16eb8e-7765-4f79-a5e8-2cf9b199421eimage2.png

All the recorded data were interpreted statistically by paired t test and “p” value was calculated to conclude the thesis objectives statistically significant. The data was analyzed using paired t test. Then difference of pain relief between was statistically significant at both 3 months as well as 6 months follow up.

The ROM for Extension, abduction and flexion increased by an average of 12.7 °, 39.5 ° and 40 ° at 6 months follow up showing greater and better increase in ROM of shoulder with PRP.

In our study paired t test was employed to know the efficacy of PRP. Our study inferred that the pain relief was better with PRP at 6 months as compared to 1 month and pre procedure. So over a short term period the pain relief is better with PRP. The difference between pre procedure and 6 months after introducing platelet rich plasma was statistically significant as indicated by the “p” value.

Results

This study included 30 patients, participants were clinically evaluated, a baseline VAS scores, SPADI and ROM were recorded. Out of the 30 participants, 20 (66.66%) were males and 10 (33.33%) were females (Table 1).

Table 1

Gender distribution of patients studied

Gender

Number of cases

Female

10

Male

20

Total

30

Most of the patients i.e., 21 (70%) in our study were aged between 50-70 years with an average age 59.33 years (Table 2).

Table 2

Age distribution of patients studied

Age (i n years)

Number of cases

30-40

1

41-50

4

51-60

10

61-70

11

71-80

4

Total

30

Mean ± SD

59.33 ±14.79

The mean age was 59.33 years with standard deviation 14.79. The mean duration of the condition in all 30 patients suffering from Adhesive capsulitis was 15.167+10.268 months (Table 3).

Table 3

Duration (months) distribution in three groups of patients studied

Duration of symptoms (months)

Number of patients (percentage)

1-5

2 (6.66)

6-10

4 (13.32%)

11-15

10 (33.33%)

16-20

6 (19.98%)

21-25

6 (19.98%)

26-30

1 (3.33%)

31-35

1 (3.33%)

Total

30 (100%)

Mean ± SD

15.167 ± 10.268

Out of 30 participants 1 patient (3.33%) had transient hypotension, 1 (3.33) patient had nausea and 1 patient (3.33%) developed skin rashes along the upper limb after PRP injection (Table 4).

Table 4

Complication

Complication

No. of cases

Transient hypotension

1 (3.33%)

Nausea

1 (3.33%)

Skin rashes

1 (3.33%)

Total

3 (10%)

The mean VAS score at the presentation was 6.66+2.499. At 1 month these scores reduced to 5.866±1.408 has compared to baseline with p value of 0.131. At 3 months these scores reduced to 5.133±1.384 has compared to baseline with pvalue of 0.004. which is statistically significant. At 6 months these scores significantly reduced to 3.4±1.473 with p value of 0.0001 which is statistically significant (Table 5).

Table 5

Visual analouge scale mean, standard deviation and P value

Time Frame

Mean

Standard deviation

P value

Pre procedure

6.66

2.499

1 months

5.866

1.408

0.131

3 months

5.133

1.384

0.004

6 months

3.4

1.473

0.001

Total

15.193

6.765

There was a statistically significant reduction inthe VASscore at 1month, 3months and 6months by paired t test.

At 1 month SPADI score was 50.53±14.811 as compared to base line 43.0+14.857 with a p valuer of 0.0616 which is statistically not significant. At 3 months SPADI score was 59.43±14.441 as compared to base line with a value of 0.0001 which is statistically significant. At 6 months SPADI score was 74.76±10.926 as compared to base line with a p value of 0.0001 which is statistically significant (Table 6).

Table 6

Shoulder pain and disability index mean, standard deviation and P value

Time frame

Mean

Standard deviation

P value

Pre procedure

43.3

14.857

1 months

50.53

14.811

0.0616

3 months

59.43

14.441

0.0001

6 months

74.76

10.926

0.0001

Total

177.49

55.025

After 6 months mean flexion was 116.33 ± 24.964 as compared to pre-procedure of 76 ±19.673 with a p valuer of 0.001 which is statistically significant. After 6 months mean extension was 31.33 ± 8.158 as compared to pre-procedure 18.6 ± 7.846 with a p value of 0.0001 which is statistically significant. After 6 months mean abduction was 126.833 ± 18.325 as compared to base line with a p value of 0.0001 which is statistically significant (Table 7).

Table 7

Range of movements mean, standard deviation and P value

Range of movements

Time frame

Mean

Standard deviation

P value

Flexion

Pre procedure

76

19.673

1 Month

86.16

21.043

0.062

3 Months

100.6

22.757

0.0003

6 Months

116.33

24.964

0.0001

Extension

Pre procedure

18.6

7.846

1 Month

21.66

8.097

0.014

3 Months

25.83

9.136

0.0017

6 Months

31.33

8.158

0.0001

Abduction

Pre procedure

87.33

21.476

1 Month

97.66

17.547

0.0582

3 Months

108.166

16.657

0.00001

6 Months

126.833

18.325

0.00001

Statistical software

For data analysis, the statistical tools SPSS22.0 and Renvironmentver.3.2.2 were utilised, and Microsoft Word and Excel were used to create tables.

Discussion

Most of the patients ages were 40 to 70 years. The average age was 59.33±14.79 years. Kothari et.al., in their study observed that the mean age of all patients was 51.9+10.1 years.64

A minor male predominance was seen in this investigation. However, this distinction lacked statistical significance (P=0.825). Crubbs et.al., study showed adhesive capsulitis is more common in middle aged women than males.52

The mean duration of symptoms were 15.167+10.268 months. The mean duration of symptoms in all patients was 15.167±10.268 months, which was comparable to a study done by Calis et al., at Turkey in 2019 where mean symptom duration was 5.11±1.90.48

At presentation all the demographic and clinical variables in terms of SPADI, ROM in Extension, abduction, flexion was comparable between different follow up periods. At presentation the mean VAS scores was 6.66+4.99. The mean VAS score at the presentation was 66.66+2.499. At 1 month these scores reduced to 5.866±1.408 has compared to baseline with p value of 0.131. At 3 months these scores reduced to 5.133±1.384 has compared to baseline with p value of 0.004 which is statistically significant. At 6 months these scores significantly reduced to 3.4±1.473 with p value of 0.0001 which is statistically significant.

At 3 months follow up the mean VAS score decreased in the groups. Indicating improvement in patients symptoms subjectively. Further at 6 months the mean VAS score decreased very significantly.

The improvement in pain relief and decrease in VAS score in our study was comparable to a study done by Madhan jayaraman et al., at Davanagere in 2018,11 where it was determined that platelet rich plasma therapy is superior for adhesive capsulitis with 0.001 for VAS score and 0.01 for DASH score, which is statistically significant compared to hydro dissection, and the patients who received it showed improve drange of motion by the end of the first month of follow up.

32 patients who had intra-articular steroid injections for frozen shoulder as part of a research by Rawat et al.34 exhibited statistically significant pain alleviation after 12 weeks of follow-up. Shah carried out a research on 40 patients, and the results showed a substantial improvement in VAS and CSS ratings with a p-value of 0.05 after 3 doses of intra-articular steroid given at regular intervals. However, in contrast to prior trials, in our research a single dose of steroid injection was administered, and after 12 weeks, the steroid group saw statistically significant pain alleviation.

At 1 month SPADI score was 50.53±14.811 as compared to base line 43.0+14.857 with a p value of 0.0616 which is statistically not significant. At 3 months SPADI score was 59.43±14.441 as compared to base line with a p value of 0.0001 which is statistically significant. At 6 months SPADI score was 74.76±10.926 as compared to base line with a p value of 0.0001 which is statistically significant.

The improvement in SPADI scores in our study was comparable to the improvement in SPADI scores in the study done by Calis et al.,48 at Turkey which concluded when compared to baseline, there were substantial improvements in the SPADI pain, SPADI disability, and SPADI total scores in functional recovery (p<0.05).

At presentation mean extension was 18.6±7.486. At 1 month the extension improved to 21.66±8.097 with P value of 0.014 which is statistically significant. At 3 months the extension improved to 25.83±9.136 with P value of 0.0017 which is statistically significant. At 6 months the extension improved to 31.33±8.158 with P value of 0.0001 which is statistically significant.

At presentation mean abduction was 87.33±21.476. At 1 month the mean abduction improved to 97.66.±17.547 with P value of 0.0582 which is statistically significant. At 3 months the mean abduction improved to 10.1666±16.657 with P value of 0.00001 which is statistically significant. At 6 months the mean abduction improved to 126.833±18.325 with a P value of 0.0001 which is statistically significant.

At presentation mean flexion was 76±19.673. At 1 month the mean flexion improved to 86.16±21.043 with P value of 0.062 which is statistically significant. At 3 months the mean flexion improved to 100.6±22.757 with P value of 0.0003 which is statistically significant. At 6 months the mean flexion improved to 116.33±24.964 with a P value of 0.0001 which is statistically significant.

The ROM for extension abduction and flexion increased by an average of 12.7 °, 39.5 ° and 40 °. at 6 months follow up showing greater and better increase in ROM at shoulder with PRP group. The improvement in ROM in our study was compared with a study done by Kothari et al.,64 at Delhi in 2017 which concluded, At 12 weeks, passive aswellas active range of motion of the should era, discomfort (VAS) and function all showed statistically significant improvements after PRP treatment compared to corticosteroid and ultrasonic therapy. Also according to a study done by Aslani et al.22 reported 60% improvement in pain, 70% improvement in functional outcome, where flexion improved from 70º to 150º, abduction improved from 75º to 135º, and external rotation improved from 25º to 50º. He also reported a 70% satisfaction score after treatment with PRP injection inpatients suffering with adhesive capsulitis. Which is comparable to our present study in terms of functional outcome in ROM, SPADI, scores and VAS scores.

Significantly more patients (92.50%) reported total pain relief after six months of follow-up. The current study outcomes were comparable to a similar study done by Kothari et al.,64 at Delhi in 2017, which concludes passive aswellas active range of motion of the shoulder, quick DASH, VAS and all showed statistically significant improvements after PRP treatment at 12 weeks compared to corticosteroid and ultrasonic therapy.

Conclusion

Hence we concluded that intra articular introduction of platelet rich plasma in periarthritis shoulder showed reduction in the intensity of pain, increase in angle of movements of shoulder joint and improvement in ability of carrying daily activities without restrictions which the patients were not able to do before.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by Institute Ethical approval Committee with ref. No. NMC/ Adm/ Ethics/ approval/ 094/ 2021.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

JS Neviaser Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: A study of the pathological findings in periarthritis of the shoulderJ Bone Joint Surg Am194527221122

2 

AI Binder DY Bulgen BL Hazleman S Roberts Frozen shoulder: A long-term prospective studyAnn Rheum Dis19844333614

3 

J Charnley Periarthritis of the shoulderPostgrad Med J1959354053848

4 

GC Lloyd-Roberts PR French Periarthritis of the shoulder: a study of the disease and its treatmentBr Med J1959201156971

5 

RG Grey The natural history of "idiopathic" frozen shoulderJ Bone Joint Surg Am1978604564

6 

GC Terry TM Chopp Functional anatomy of the shoulderJ Athl Train200035324855

7 

SW Carmichael DL Hart Anatomy of the shoulder jointJ Orthop Sports Physical Therapy1985642258

8 

Anatomy, Function, and Dysfunction of the Shoulder ComplexThe Shoulder Section III: the upper extremitiesWolters KluwerNetherlands23955https://downloads.lww.com/wolterskluwer_vitalstream_com/sample-content/9780781795746_Hendrickson/samples/Chapter06.pdf

9 

WK Hsu A Mishra SR Rodeo F Fu MA Terry P Randelli Platelet-rich plasma in orthopaedic applications: evidence-based recommendations for treatmentJ Am Acad Orthop Surg2013211273948

10 

HS Uppal JP Evans C Smith Frozen shoulder: A systematic review of therapeutic optionsWorld J Orthop2015622638

11 

BJ Carr SO Canapp DA Canapp LJ Gamble DL Dycus Adhesive Capsulitis in Eight Dogs: Diagnosis and ManagementFront Vet Sci2016355

12 

V Shekhar GV Reddy Role of Intra Articular Steroid Injection In Early Adhesive Capsulitis of ShoulderIOSR J Dent Med Sci (IOSR- JDMS20171633840

13 

M Widiastuti-Samekto GP Sianturi Frozen shoulder syndrome: comparison of oral route corticosteroid and intra-articular corticosteroid injectionMed J Malaysia20045933126

14 

HT Çalış Ç Karabaş E Güler Effects of Platelet-rich Plasma Injection on Adhesive Capsulitis: An Interventional Case SeriesErciyes Med J20194111024

15 

M Jeyaraman R Ramesh GS Prajwal HJ Dhamsania The comparative and prospective study on efficacy and functional outcome of autologous platelet rich plasma injection vs hydrodissection in adhesive capsulitis of shoulderInt J Res Orthop20184616

16 

AI Binder DY Bulgen BL Hazleman S Roberts Frozen shoulder: a long-term prospective studyAnn Rheum Dis19844333614

17 

C Milgrom V Novack Y Weil S Jaber DR Radeva-Petrova A Finestone Risk factors for idiopathic frozen shoulderIsr Med Assoc J20081053614

18 

TK Lim KH Koh MS Shon SW Lee YE Park JC Yoo Intra-articular injection of hyaluronate versus corticosteroid in adhesive capsulitisOrthopedics201437108605

19 

R Dhurat M Sukesh Principles and Methods of Preparation of Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Review and Author's PerspectiveJ Cutan Aesthet Surg20147418997

20 

B Shaffer JE Tibone RK Kerlan Frozen shoulder. A long-term follow-upJ Bone Joint Surg Am199274573846

21 

RD Parker AI Froimson DD Winsberg NZ Arsham Frozen Shoulder: Part I: Chronology, Pathogenesis, Clinical Picture and TreatmentOrthopedics198912686973

22 

TE Rizk RS Pinals Frozen shoulderSemin Arthritis Rheumatism198211444052

23 

NA Friedman MM Laban Periarthrosis of the shoulder associated with diabetes mellitusAm J Phys Med Rehabil1989681124

24 

TD Bunker PP Anthony The pathology of frozen shoulder. A Dupuytren-like diseaseJ Bone Joint Surg Br199577567783

25 

JI Ozaki Y Nakagawa G Sakurai S Tamai Recalcitrant chronic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Role of contracture of the coracohumeral ligament and rotator interval in pathogenesis and treatmentJ Bone Joint Surg Am1989711015115

26 

Y Sun P Zhang S Liu H Li J Jiang S Chen Intra-articular Steroid Injection for Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Trial Sequential AnalysisAm J Sports Med201745921719

27 

SA Rodeo JA Hannafin J Tom RF Warren TL Wickiewicz Immunolocalization of cytokines and their receptors in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulderJ Orthop Res199715342736

28 

TE Rizk RS Pinals Histocompatibility type and racial incidence in frozen shoulderArch Phys Med Rehabil1984651334

29 

SA Vinores PA Campochiaro Prevention or moderation of some ultrastructural changes in the RPE and retina of galactosemic rats by aldose reductase inhibitionExp Eye Res1989493495510

30 

WN Levine CP Kashyap SF Bak CS Ahmad TA Blaine LU Bigliani Nonoperative management of idiopathic adhesive capsulitisJ Shoulder Elbow Surg200716556973

31 

JW O'kane S Jackins JA Sidles KL Smith FA Matsen Simple home program for frozen shoulder to improve patients' assessment of shoulder function and health statusJ Am Board Fam Pract19991242707

32 

D Hertling RM Kessler Management of Common Musculoskeletal Disorders: Physical Therapy Principles and MethodsillustratedLippincott Williams & WilkinsUnited States2006

33 

EA Malavolta MEC Gracitelli EE Sunada E Benegas FDS Prada RB Neto Platelet-rich plasma in arthroscopic repairs of complete tears of the rotator cuffRev Bras Ortop20154767417

34 

MS Rawat A Juyal A Agarwal Evaluation of the role of intra-articular steroid injection in frozen shoulderInt J Orthop Sci2018417924

35 

R Dias S Cutts S Massoud Frozen shoulderBMJ2005331753014536

36 

C Sonal S Kothari L Nonica Comparison of ultrasonic therapy, sodium hyaluronate injection and steroid injection in the treatment of peri-arthritis shoulder201223105115

37 

AS Neviaser JA Hannafin Adhesive capsulitis: a review of current treatmentAm J Sports Med20103811234656

38 

Rockwood CA Matsen FA Murnaghan lP: Frozen shoulderThe Shoulder1990W.B. Saunders CompanyPhiladelphia837862

39 

P Page A Labbe Adhesive capsulitis: use the evidence to integrate your interventionsN Am J Sports Phys Ther20105426673

40 

MJ Griesser JD Harris JE Campbell GL Jones Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a systematic review of the effectiveness of intra-articular corticosteroid injectionsJ Bone Joint Surg Am20119318172733

41 

V Blanchard S Barr FL Cerisola The effectiveness of corticosteroid injections compared with physiotherapeutic interventions for adhesive capsulitis: a systematic reviewPhysiotherapy201096295107

42 

KH Koh Corticosteroid injection for adhesive capsulitis in primary care: a systematic review of randomised clinical trialsSingapore Med J2016571264657

43 

RN Frank Sorbinil and limited joint mobility in diabeticsJAMA19852541114524

44 

GCR Hand NA Athanasou T Matthews AJ Carr The pathology of frozen shoulderJ Bone Joint Surg200789B92832

45 

I Ryans A Montgomery R Galway WG Kernohan R Mckane A randomized controlled trial of intra-articular triamcinolone and/or physiotherapy in shoulder capsulitisRheumatol200544452935

46 

R Buchbinder JL Hoving S Green S Hall A Forbes P Nash Short course prednisolone for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder or stiff painful shoulder): a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trialAnn Rheum Dis2004631114609

47 

B Reeves The natural history of the frozen shoulder syndromeScand J Rheumatol1975441936

48 

GM D’orsi AG Via A Frizziero F Oliva Treatment of adhesive capsulitis: a reviewMuscles Ligaments Tendons J201222708

49 

RN Mukherjee RM Pandey HL Nag R Mittal Frozen shoulder-A prospective randomized clinical trialWorld J Orthop2017853949

50 

F Kozin Two unique shoulder disorders. Adhesive capsulitis and reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndromePostgrad Med198373520710

51 

M Fukaya A Ito A New Economic Method for Preparing Platelet-rich PlasmaPlast Reconstr Surg Glob Open201426162

52 

N Crubbs Frozen shoulder syndrome: a review of literatureJ Orthop Sports Phys Ther199318347987

53 

RG Marx RW Malizia K Kenter TL Wickiewicz JA Hannafin Intra-articular corticosteroid injection for the treatment of idiopathic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulderHSS J2007322027

54 

BA De Jong R Dahmen JA Hogeweg RK Marti Intra-articular triamcinolone acetonide injection in patients with capsulitis of the shoulder: a comparative study of two dose regimensClin Rehabil19981232115

55 

RA Sakeni MSM Al-Nimer Comparison between intraarticular triamcinolone acetonide and methylprednisolone acetate injections in treatment of frozen shoulderSaudi Med J200728570712

56 

HM Choi SH Kim CK Kim HG Choi DH Shin KI Uhm The Cheapest and Easiest Way to Make Platelet-rich Plasma PreparationArch Aesthet Plast Surg2015211127

57 

BL Eppley JE Woodell J Higgins Platelet quantification and growth factor analysis from platelet-rich plasma: implications for wound healingPlast Reconstr Surg2004114615028

58 

T Tanishima N Yoshimasu Development and prevention of frozen shoulder after acute aneurysm surgerySurg Neurol19974811922

59 

L Andrén BJ Lundberg Treatment of rigid shoulders by joint distension during arthrographyActa Orthop Scand19653614553

60 

JS Scibek CR Carcia Assessment of scapulohumeral rhythm for scapular plane shoulder elevation using a modified digital inclinometerWorld J Orthop2012368794

61 

EA Codman The shoulder : rupture of the supraspinatus tendon and other lesions in or about the subacromial bursaBoston193465107

62 

E Duplay De la périarthrite scapulo-huméral et des raideurs de l'epaule qui en son la conséquenceArch Gén Méd187220513513

63 

H Aslani ST Nourbakhsh Z Zafarani M Ahmadi-Bani MES Ananloo M Beigy Platelet-rich plasma for frozen shoulder: A case reportArch Bone Jt Surg201641903

64 

SY Kothari V Srikumar N Singh Comparative efficacy of platelet rich plasma injection, corticosteroid injection and ultrasonic therapy in the treatment of periarthritis shoulderJ Clin Diagn Res2017115158

65 

AC Agrawal B Nayak H Sakale Management of Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder Joint by Single Platelet Rich Plasma InjectionJ Orthop Traumatol Rehabil2019111625

66 

Y Kim GC Lee Immediate Effects of Angular Joint Mobilization (a New Concept of Joint Mobilization) on Pain, Range of Motion, and Disability in a Patient with Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis: A Case ReportAm J Case Rep20171814856

67 

AG Perez JF Lana AA Rodrigues AC Luzo WD Belangero MH Santana Relevant aspects of centrifugation step in the preparation of platelet-rich plasmaISRN Hematol20142014176060



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.